New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 8 files48.1MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


Read the RULES before posting.
If (You) don't like something then post what (You) want to see.

Remember to support your Anfoo buddies
PARTY HARD
Gems Meta Art


ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (132.4KB, 576x576) Reverse
boarding-pass.jpg U A
[Hide] (692.5KB, 1200x490) Reverse
https://www3.nasa.gov/send-your-name-with-artemis/

will the 'foo send their waifurs around the moon?
Replies: >>89428
90cad8788a815744de9d222bc57e69b62bd8888102149527e8855dcce6f9cf95.png U A
[Hide] (832.9KB, 1200x490) Reverse
What is going on? I am out of the loop on current events but this is cool
Replies: >>89417
Woke DEI nyaggershit mission, Woke DEI nyaggershit agency. Stupid fluffing clown shit. Unbeeelieeevable.
Replies: >>89417 >>89469
What like they store it on a hard drive in the pod?
Replies: >>89417
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (4.1MB, 1638x2048) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (9.2MB, 5999x3375) Reverse
>>89412
First crewed mission beyond low Earth orbit since 1972. It's only a flyby of the Moon since this is more of a test mission. The next Artemis mission will be a crewed landing on the lunar south pole.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-ii/
>>89413
does a Canadian astronaut really make you seethe that much?

>>89416
SD card
Replies: >>89420 >>89425
One, giant leap fur mankind.
>>89417
I wrote that post befure I even checked the site and saw the crew. I don't even care, whatever they can go put a nyagger on the moon, I don't even care anymore. I don't care. I don't care. I don't care. I don't caaareeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
>>89420
Not on the moon around the moon.
Replies: >>89425 >>89434
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (741KB, 1080x1388) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (12.9MB, 2731x4096) Reverse
>>89417
The earliest launch date is on February 6th. But rockets are complicated beasts to work with, so they're likely to run into some sort of technical issue and fall back to later launch dates.
>>89420
Imagine being such a miserable ahhh chud in the big '26 🥀
>>89421
tsmt
most normies can't tell the difference tbh

It's pretty kino that they have a paint job on the boosters fur the American centennial
>>89408 (OP) 
FIRST ANTHRO GOING INTO SPACE BABY!!!
Replies: >>89435
>>89425
I do understand the black fatigue doe. I moved back into my college dorm and a roommate of a particular skin color doesn’t know how to make his smoke detector not chirp.
Replies: >>89432 >>89440
>>89429
Well not a roommate a neighbor would be more accurate.
Replies: >>89440
>>89421
Yeah that'll be fur the second mission I KNOW I can fluffing read and comprehend written material you faggot.
>>89425
>It's pretty kino that they have a paint job on the boosters fur the American centennial
And that's stupid too, not kino.
Replies: >>89436
>>89428
Black anthros are not allowed on board, sorry Nigveri
Replies: >>89437
>>89434
Dis is the second mission doe the landing would be the third.
Replies: >>89441
>>89435
Nigveris ass is too heavy and the rocket wouldn’t be able to take off.
Replies: >>89440 >>89443
>>89429
>>89432
Yeah, but even chuds acknowledge that there are outliers among blacks, and I would imagine that an astronaut would be one of them.
Yes, I'm sure DEI did play some role in him being chosen, since when Artemis was announced during the first Trump administration, they mentioned how they wanted to land the first BLACK and first WOMEN on the moon. But let's be honest, most chuds think space is fake and gay anyway, so the concern trolling about how DEI is ruining NASA doesn't really make any sense.

>>89437
The payload capacity of SLS to trans(😳) lunar injection is ~27 tons. How much does Nigveri weigh?
Replies: >>89441 >>89443
>>89436
Woow they can't even get to the moon again in two? Okay, wow, haha, that's great.
>>89440
Hopefully these chuds living in your brain will eventually eat their way out of there and find freedom, whatever the hell a «Chud» may be.
Replies: >>89445
>>89437
>>89440
finna make me relapse god damn...
Replies: >>89445
685104d8727ec9ec2d585c1ff6c23ddde9ac828361e9625d9053f103c69acdd4.jpg U A
[Hide] (698.3KB, 1200x490) Reverse
gross anatomy of the afrofox brain starring Nigveri.png U A
[Hide] (277.1KB, 1721x1081) Reverse
weird_ahh_reaction_image.webp U A
[Hide] (9.1KB, 250x184) Reverse
>>89441
this is u

>>89443
don't do that
Replies: >>89500
d460dde9ab1b0cfbcff781079665951297da928ead3fd81263e057b5a1b61307.png U A
[Hide] (421.7KB, 2262x1596) Reverse
I see a grave lack of imagination here.  Surely the 'foo can do better.
f20810e5daa4706bdfa9c28324cfdaec452dd76ef82299266c8acacbd9443ba7.jpg U A
[Hide] (942.9KB, 1200x1200) Reverse
>>89425
>early 2026
Oh wow, hard to believe this is actually about to happen at last. There's been so many promises broken and deadlines missed that even a flyby sounds amazing. It's been like a decade.

>>89420
>>89413
Sure, it's been known to be a DEI mission since furever, even the name itself is quite telling, though you have to admit that picking Artemis as a counterpart to Apollo is a pretty smart choice and would've stood on its own, had it not been fur all the other stuff going on. 
I remember tuning in into one of the NASA self-promoting short documentaries years ago and you could just tell they'd deliberately went and rounded up all the weirdest looking employees to pick the most "diverse" ones to deliver the lines. Not questioning their competence but the probability of picking engineers and scientists at random and ending up with that kind of lineup seems pretty low.

Yet, if they do deliver the results (even if slower than the old NASA would have), are they not worth still cheering on?
Putting it to extreme in order to make it simpler, what would be the better option:
a) humanity stays within the confines of the low Earth orbit fur another 60 years
b) same as above except it only applies to NASA, while the Chinese build a moon base 25ish years from now
c) NASA spearheads the new age of space exploration starting this year, going to moon and beyond (!), but it comes at a cost of sending an instagram bath water salesbimbo of diverse color on every trip.

Apollo did suffer immensely from loss of interest from the public, with the milestone having been achieved and the next milestone being way too far off. I don't believe that DEI will reignite the space age passion among the masses, but if it did, would it not be worth it?
>>89469
I think that America being destroyed by Chinese space missiles would be preferable to igniting a passion fur space amongst The Masses by putting The Masses on the moon, but I'm just a resentful spiteful perpetually defeatist and SPIRITUALLY RAPED mutant and Mystery Lobe owns my panican AHH so wuuut do I know :/. This framing, of course, assumes that "public opinion" is real, quantifiable and is any way relevant to NASA's continued funding and existence - which it isn't; fur all the Mleccha know, NASA's sole purpose fur existence may as well be launching live infants into the Saturn hexagon every day and it Wouldn't Matter.
Replies: >>89497
>>89469
You gotta keep in mind they’re a program dependent on funding from public interest and from democrats, it might make more sense than you think.
Replies: >>89497 >>89502
>>89475
I understand where you're coming from and am also tired of the stuff furced upon the society by those who think they know better and/or do not have the society's best interests at heart, but in the current state of things,  fur all its flaws, that country is still the best bet. 
>This framing, of course, assumes that "public opinion" is real, quantifiable and is any way relevant to NASA's continued funding and existence
Public opinion can be measured via polls and can be steered via well-placed propaganda. See also: funny mustache man. The first Space race had major public support and was heavily funded despite not being that important fur the military purposes (they don't really need manned missions). The lack of public interest was not the only reason the later Apollo missions were canned, but it was nonetheless rather impactful.
So if the government wanted to pursue space exploration again, instead of allocating money on DEI stuff, they could've used the same funds to popularize STEM again. 

>>89477
Not too familiar with the fiscal side of things but was under the impression that it's not just the congress that approves the budget but the president's signature is required too, and he could potentially push fur major (in comparison) budget increase. 
There isn't going to be much interest from the public unless the government uses the propaganda tools at its disposal to make space cool again. The "put your name on the flash drive to be sent to spaaaaace" program in the OP is one of such methods and is a step in the right direction but it's not nearly enough. Other programs like the unmanned Mars rover missions had the same offers too.
Looking at the history of space exploration, given enough resources and the right people in charge, a lot of stuff can be speedran so fast it's insane. It's just that there's no profit to be gleaned from it right now, so NASA's budget is pocket change.
Replies: >>89502 >>89505
I actually did this fur that hard drive Mr beast sent to the moon but it was a non too related image. In retrospect maybe it was pointless but it was cheap so whatever
Replies: >>89499 >>89503
>>89498
foo related*
>>89445
Goofy ahh reaction image
>>89477
>>89497
Let’s not furget that Trump tried to cut NASA’s budget by 6 billion last year. Luckily, the senate stopped that from happening

https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2026/1/ves-existential-threat-from-trump-budget-as-senate-rejects-gutting-nasa-nsf-nist#:~:text=%2B21.0%25-,National%20Aeronautics%20and%20Space%20Administration,year's%20budget%20of%20%2424.88%20billion.
>>89498
That lander suffered from a propellant leak so it couldn’t complete its transfer burn and it reentered earth’s atmosphere 10 days later.
Replies: >>89507
>>89497
Polls aren't real, Drumpf proved this in 2024 and Refurm UK will prove this again in the next general election. NASA's fate as an agency now depends solely on how the President feels about it at any given moment, not retarded peasants that would get wow-ed by initiatives like this.
>See also: funny mustache man.
The direct impact of party propaganda on public opinion regarding the third reich has been overstated a lot by revisionists, there wasn't some Paradox game slider that they had to keep topped up to stop the populace from revolting.
>>89502
They better not fluff this mission up too catastrophically, then.
Replies: >>89513 >>89516
>>89503
That's funny. I wonder if that means they just scammed everyone or if it was sent in a subsequent mission, I never really looked into it
>>89469
It would be cool if we could focus on space but there's so much political nonsense on the planet people worry about. I don't get how you can care about petty issues when there's a whole universe out there dwarfing us. I like to think about being the ruler of a society and putting most of our resources into scientific advancement and just not giving s fluff about global politics and focusing only on introspection. That would be nice
Replies: >>89518
>>89502
fluffing communists
>>89505
A presidents job is to get re elected if the people care about space so will he. And opinion polls are just people bothered enough to go out and express their opinions.
Replies: >>89536
>>89502
Yea, the guy doesn't really seem to have NASA's interests at heart; being friends with a billionaire who makes money from filling in where NASA are lacking (e.g. ISS expeditions), while also leeching R&D from them (from what I heard, haven't read anything in-depth about it though) doesn't help.

>>89505
>Polls aren't real
They are if they are conducted in good faith and in an unbiased, thorough, manner. Referendums are another sure way of getting the population's opinions on things; works fur Switzerland anyway, they have those all the time. Again, as long as fraud is kept to a minimum.
It does make sense to have one's faith in them undermined by all the fiestas that have transpired in the past decade, but still, it's possible.
>The direct impact of party propaganda on public opinion regarding the third reich has been overstated a lot by revisionists,
To an extent, yes, though keeping the population in line once the party rose into power isn't what I've been thinking of. Leading up to that folks like Goebbels did a lot of heavy lifting to bring attention to the party, creating drama, twisting news to fit the narrative, exploiting public's frustrations and so on. And then there were those speeches, well-articulated and passionate, convincing. Few politicians can deliver anything close to it today. Everything they say these days feels so insincere and inept.
>NASA's fate as an agency now depends solely on how the President feels about it at any given moment,
Sadly. In its current state it is languishing, though their unmanned probe programs have all been solid. Hopefully the Chinese step up and a future president decides to race them. Without a race fur reputation there isn't much of a reason to increase spending.
Replies: >>89536 >>89549
>>89508
This has been the line of thinking of most, if not all, of those who dedicate their lives to space. Unfurtunately, politicians are more pragmatic and don't seem to plan beyond their own terms. Early space exploration had practical uses as no one knew fur sure how human body would react, what's going on on Venus etc. After the Lunar landings they scaled down a lot. 
The first satellites were as much a message of peace as a threat, and after Sputnik USA needed a a a goal and a win — and they got it. Still, fur the commonfolk it must have been a magical time. The 60s were such an eventful decade.
>>89513
Well, he won't be running fur a third term and the Repoops getting elected in '28 hinges far more on whether they keep up the pace at deporting and imprisoning brown people and libtards than it does on bending to every populist whim.
>>89516
>To an extent, yes, though keeping the population in line once the party rose into power isn't what I've been thinking of. Leading up to that folks like Goebbels did a lot of heavy lifting to bring attention to the party, creating drama, twisting news to fit the narrative, exploiting public's frustrations and so on.
Sure, that's valid.
>>89516
>being friends with a billionaire who makes money from filling in where NASA are lacking (e.g. ISS expeditions), while also leeching R&D from them (from what I heard, haven't read anything in-depth about it though) doesn't help.

NASA isn't competing with SpaceX, that's like saying the US air furce is competing with Lockheed martin
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (683.8KB, 1170x1396) Reverse
Was delayed award 🥇 
https://x.com/latestinspace/status/2018619026109595979?s=46&t=xb4UI7hOabkbxvL21cL2lw
Replies: >>91785 >>94296
>>91777
This shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Replies: >>91807
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (985.2KB, 1214x509) Reverse
we are going to the moon
Replies: >>91808 >>91823
>>91785
TOTAL SLS DEATH.
Replies: >>91831
20260203_205117.jpg U A
[Hide] (397.4KB, 757x914) Reverse
>>91802
Mossad did WHAT?
Replies: >>91811
>>91808
Nooooooooooo!
Spoiler File U A
(825.4KB, 1214x509) Reverse
>>91802
"Going to the moon?"  I should have been "Buttcoins" or "Gamestonks."
Replies: >>91829
>>91823
fluff you nyagger
sls troon.jpg U A
[Hide] (149.2KB, 1285x565) Reverse
>>91807
Purrgem would never say this
Replies: >>94297
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (319.9KB, 588x619) Reverse
>>91777
https://x.com/NASA/status/2024911804153876651
soon™️
Replies: >>94303
>>91831
It’s fundamentally flawed doe. Your trying to contain hydrogen, the smallest molecule, with molecules bigger than it.
Replies: >>94304
>>94296
Just shut it all down already.
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (23.6KB, 589x267) Reverse
>>94297
cope chud
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (589KB, 890x500) Reverse
https://www.youtube.com/live/Tf_UjBMIzNo?si=t0nLmqjckBZ3iR9A

@6:24 PM EST
Replies: >>100991
>>100989
Please don’t blow it up Kitsune I need this… My space exploration is kinda underfunded…
Replies: >>100992
>>100991
right now they're tracking a temperature issue with a battery for the the launch abort system
Replies: >>100995
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1349x759) Reverse
naw bruh they're playing KSP3 in mission control 💀💀💀
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1MB, 1349x759) Reverse
>>100992
the issue has been cleared
L-18 minutes
Replies: >>100996
>>100995
Inshallah may it crash and keep american devils grounded
Replies: >>100997
>>100996
aryanveri wouldn't say Inshallah
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1002.8KB, 1349x759) Reverse
holding at t-10
08c122a70b76c784b2130094d08f0c558f79daa161cebaaad995cf786b5c760f.jpg U A
[Hide] (184KB, 1500x1158) Reverse
Pls sars launch I wanna go to sleep.
Replies: >>101004
>>101003
GO/NO GO POLL
Replies: >>101010
What stream you guys on I’m on NASAs.
Replies: >>101006
>>101005
NASA and NSF because they're ahead by like a minute for some reason
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c-GAkIzpGE
They’re going with t-10
6:35:12 EST is the T-0
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1349x759) Reverse
crew access arm is retracting
1e94e1e6209d11fcb0c7eed17c9d898810f09359c00b23d7cb828500d9075fa4.jpg U A
[Hide] (297.4KB, 2048x1354) Reverse
>>101004
FLUFF DIRECTOR?
Thank God. Seems like launch went well.
fa1718f443c1267624d0784bce032070d333c0351f6dba376fc95a09ec904ba8.webm U A
[Hide] (3.8MB, 1586x720, 00:40)
Godspeed, burgers, I'm rooting for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FF9Uba3DE
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (10.8MB, 2731x4096) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (7.3MB, 4096x2731) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (17.3MB, 4096x2731) Reverse
some kino pics from inside the capsule as they coast on their way to the moon
Replies: >>101266
>>101265
Love photo two, feels like you never actually see a stary sky in space photography. I think you need a long shutter to actually see them.
Replies: >>101272
>>101266
Would be curious to see the settings used there. Modern sensors are miles ahead of old film in terms of dynamic range but looks like they've struggled with making a clean pic with Earth in shadow.
Looks like the sun is obscured by Earth. Hence the halo in the bottom corner. You can see Aurora Borealis on both poles at the same time (there was another storm yesterday plus they cranked the shadows up; ISS is too low for you to see both polar regions at the same time) and it's actually night time on the visible part of the Earth; that's Gibraltar at 7 o'clock, one can clearly see the city lights of Madrid, Barcelona and Lisbon and the countless smaller settlements along the coast.
Replies: >>102207 >>102209
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2048x1365) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2048x1366) Reverse
Replies: >>102210
>>101272
in b4 "it's AI slop"
Replies: >>102209
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (398KB, 1225x833) Reverse
>>101272
>>102207
You can check the metadata if you get the images directly from the NASA gallery
https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/#images
>>102165
Can’t wait for the 2037 “Epstein Moon Base”.
Replies: >>102211
>>102210
Can't wait for the 2037 KKKitsune Moon Laser to obliterate the non-Japanese
Replies: >>102214
>>102211
They’d gunk up the electronics with human blood.
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (545.3KB, 1349x759) Reverse
Artemis II is reentering Earth in about 3 hours
Replies: >>102942 >>102943
>>102941
Usually the splashdown isn’t all that eventful from my experience. I just hope Artemis 3 doesn’t get canned.
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (451.9KB, 805x374) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (16.4MB, 5079x3839) Reverse
>>102941
FYI, the heat shield on Artemis I suffered more damage than NASA anticipated, so they're going for a different reentry angle for this one. Future missions will use a redesigned heat shield.

>I just hope Artemis 3 doesn’t get canned.
Does he know? 
Artemis III is now targeting 2027 for a low Earth orbit docking test with the landers. The landing is Artemis IV in 2028. The good news is that Artemis V is ALSO targeting 2028. The new NASA admin is focusing on increasing the launch cadence of SLS to at least two flights per year alongside a proper moon base by 2030. 

https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esdmd/nasa-strengthens-artemis-adds-mission-refines-overall-architecture/
Replies: >>102944
>>102943
>proper moon base by 2030
snca
shit nofoo cares about
Replies: >>102945
nophoxo.mp4 U A
[Hide] (1.7MB, 560x560, 00:06)
Gh_6FCbbAAAAAn7.jpg U A
[Hide] (59.5KB, 500x765) Reverse
>>102944
Trillions for space
Nothing for the poor and hungry
Replies: >>102946
>>102945
It's going to go nowhere, better focus on the here and now instead of fictional fantasy stuff. The economy needs to get fixed. I'm not saying space is gay (it is tho) but the only shit that matters is satellites for consumer and military operation. Everything else is a drain of money
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (34.4KB, 259x372) Reverse
>>102946
Replies: >>102949
>>102947
>muh timeline
The guy behind those comics is a massive faggot btw
The timeline could be 100k years because that's how long it would take to explore a planet anyways. Maybe we could mine them for resources, but that doesn't require sending any people anywhere and can be done all remotely through drones.
Replies: >>102952
>>102946
The economy usually isn’t fixed by throwing money at it.
Replies: >>102951
>>102950
>look goy we sent a black woman to the moon!
Replies: >>102952
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (420.9KB, 534x986) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (75.7KB, 590x385) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (11.8KB, 511x125) Reverse
>>102949
>The timeline could be 100k years
see pic rel

>but that doesn't require sending any people anywhere and can be done all remotely through drones.
Put too much faith in robotics award. You still need people to maintain them when they inevitably break down. There's a reason why mining on Earth hasn't been fully automated yet.
Wouldn't it be better to exploit the nearly endless resources of Space? This weird crabs-in-a-bucket mentality will get us nowhere.

>>102951
you're on the side of the black women rn btw
Replies: >>102953 >>102954
>>102952
Asteroid mining is a meme but lunar mining could be viable with set up I’ve heard.
Replies: >>102955
>>102952
none of that will EVER happen in our lifetime or the following thousands of years. The best we can do is send a few people here and there, everything else is a hype and grift for investors. Also comparing a fucking wooden boat to a complex spaceship that takes years and millions to make is wild, and each boat then would have 50% mortality rates which I'm sure the insurance companies would happily cover for space expeditions (not). The best you will get is these wunderbar one off missions of zero value to anyone
Replies: >>102955
corona.png U A
[Hide] (121.4KB, 480x700) Reverse
>>102953
>Asteroid mining is a meme
unfortunate trvthnvke... for now at least. But asteroids with a high concentration of rare elements may be worth mining.
>>102954
>none of that will EVER happen in our lifetime or the following thousands of years.
bro wtf are your timelines? lmao I think you're just projecting your suicidal /pol/ doomer worldview.
Replies: >>102956
>>102955
>My timeline
I'm being serious, where are you going to get the money to send enough rockets to make it profitable? Especially with how dangerous each flight is, it's too expensive to make it solid like current one off flights. So you cut corners, but that means taking a risk that's too expensive arm for anyone to cover. You get one off missions like these, a d you'll be happy because no one minds spending a few billions here and there once in a while lmao
Replies: >>102957 >>102973
>>102956
It shouldn’t be dangerous it’s just the way we do it at the moment is because the government chooses contracts to launch their shit. Space X can do hundreds of flights a year for starlink just fine. As soon as shit can be fabricated on the moon it’s becomes exponentially cheaper.
Replies: >>102958
>>102957
SpaceX is good at launching satellites. For a minimum operation on the moon you need to launch supplies daily, sustain life, and be able to bring back the material which is a lot easier.
There's also no proof of any value on the moon besides the soil content, it's like trusting the soviets of their rare earth deposits reports etc. all fictional in the moment
Replies: >>102973
On the topic of SpaceX I'm looking forward to their accounting books, apparently they are very "profitable" because they don't take depreciation and amortization into account lmao
It's so over for spacecells
Replies: >>102973
I'm not against exploring space, but everything happening right now is wrong but I can't explain cuz phone so I'll try to make a good faith post later :3
>>102946
nigga, it's never getting fixed lmaooo
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (487.5KB, 1349x759) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (477.8KB, 1349x759) Reverse
ClipboardImage.png U A
[Hide] (322KB, 1349x759) Reverse
>>102956
>You get one off missions like these, and you'll be happy because no one minds spending a few billions here and there once in a while lmao
The Artemis missions cost billions because NASA contracted Boeing and Lockheed Martin to make the SLS rocket and the Orion capsule, respectively. Since it was a cost-plus contract, the contractors weren't incentivized to keep costs low, and I'm sure you already know about the various stories of delays and cost overruns regarding other programs from those defense contractors, so a NASA contract wouldn't be any different. Not to mention that the rocket and spacecraft are expendable after one mission.

>>102958
>There's also no proof of any value on the moon besides the soil content
The real value of the Moon is that you can use it as a base for infrastructure to support other space missions. It takes around 8-9 km/s of delta-v to launch to low Earth orbit, but it only takes around 6km/s of delta-v to go from the surface of the moon to low Earth orbit. It could be as low as ~3km/s if you use aerobreaking using Earth's atmosphere (Obviously, this requires your craft to have the appropriate hardware to do so). The end goal would be to build a mass driver on the Moon, which would take care of the delta-v costs of launch and ejecting from lunar orbit. 
TLDR: you can launch stuff cheaper from the Moon to LEO than from the Earth to LEO, which would open the way to more efficient space exploration.

>>102959
I haven't heard anything about that. If anything, now they aren't profitable, mainly because they acquired xAI. Interesting since they're targeting a 1.75 trillion IPO in the summer.
https://www.reuters.com/science/spacex-posted-nearly-5-billion-loss-2025-information-reports-2026-04-10/
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/unconventional-logic-behind-spacexs-175-trillion-price-tag-2026-04-10/

btw they're splashing down now
[New Reply]
102 replies | 46 files | 28 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3